Guarded file descriptors

ABSTRACT

Guarded file access operations are provided for creating and using guarded file descriptors, which can detect and prevent erroneous file access operations in computer programs. A file descriptor can be associated with a guard identifier to create a guarded file descriptor. The association can be established when the file is opened, and can be maintained independently of the computer program, which ordinarily maintains its own association between files, file descriptors, and guard identifiers. Subsequent file operations using the guarded file descriptor check that the guard identifier previously associated with that file descriptor is presented, and generate errors without performing the requested file operations if the correct guard identifier is not presented. This check serves as a validation of the computer program&#39;s use of file descriptors. An error and stack trace can be generated for use in analyzing a cause of the guard violation.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent ApplicationNo. 61/660,656, filed Jun. 15, 2012, and entitled “GUARDED FILEDESCRIPTORS,” and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/663,501,filed Jun. 22, 2012, and entitled “GUARDED FILED DESCRIPTORS,” both ofwhich are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety and for allpurposes.

BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field

The described embodiment relates generally to computer operations. Moreparticularly, the described embodiment discloses guarded filedescriptors used to prevent erroneous file operations and resultant datacorruption.

2. Related Art

Computer based structured storage systems, such as computer file systemsand database systems, have been remarkably successful at providing userswith quick and easy access to enormous amounts of data. The importanceof these structured storage systems in today's commerce is difficult toexaggerate. For example, structured storage systems have allowedbusinesses to generate and maintain enormous stores of persistent datathat the company can modify and update over the course of years. Formany companies, this persistent data is a valuable capital asset that isemployed each day to perform the company's core operations. The data canbe, for example, computer files (e.g., source code, word processingdocuments, etc.), database records and information (e.g., information onemployees, customers, and/or products), and/or Web pages.

Applications can be built of many cooperating frameworks and librariesthat share a dense namespace of file descriptors. The file descriptorstake the form of a finite number of small integer values (enumerated as,for example, a 32 bit integer). These small integer values are used by alarge family of application programming interfaces (“APIs”) thatmanipulate kernel abstractions such as files, sockets, shared memory,etc. If a particular library or framework opens a file descriptor on aprivate object (e.g., a database file), it can be disadvantageous forother code to access the file descriptor prior to the completion of theoperation, since the other code can perform operations that canaccidentally damage data associated with the file descriptors, filelocks, and the underlying objects that they represent. As anotherexample, sometimes the application can be hosting a “plug in” written bya third party, in which case care must be taken in how such filedescriptors to files containing critical content are handled, since thatcode may be more vulnerable to code injection or other securitycompromises. For example, if an application opens a database file, afile descriptor having a numeric value such as “3” is returned to theapplication. The application can then write data to the file byreferencing that file descriptor value. However, if another portion ofthe application, such as the plug in, performs a file operation such asa write or close using the file descriptor value 3, whetherinadvertently or intentionally, the contents of the file and informationrelated to the file, such as file locks, can become damaged. Therefore,what is desired is a more robust file descriptor system that can preventdamaging of file descriptors and associated data such as file locks, andthe underlying objects.

SUMMARY

The present application describes various embodiments regarding methodsand apparatus for guarding against erroneous use of file descriptorswhen accessing or performing operations on files. In one or moreembodiments, the guarded file descriptors disclosed herein can be usedin a computer program to detect the use of incorrect file descriptorvalues in file operations (e.g., close, read, write, dup2) performed bythe program, and further to identify the locations in the program codeat which the file operations are invoked with the erroneous filedescriptors. A file descriptor can be a parameter to a file operation,identifying a particular file on which the operation is to be performed,and can be thought of as a number that refers to an open file. In oneaspect, a “guarded file descriptor” is a file descriptor that isassociated with a “guard identifier,” which can be understood as a valuethat is unique to that file descriptor, i.e., unique within theoperating system process. The guard identifier can take the form of, forexample, a large random number, such as a 128 bit universally uniqueidentifier (UUID), which is expected to be a unique number. A computerprogram can create a guarded file descriptor using, for example, aprogram code operation with a name such as “guarded_open” that opens afile, creates a file descriptor for the file, associates a given guardidentifier with the file descriptor, and provides the file descriptor tothe invoking computer program. The value for the guard identifier can bea numeric value, and can be supplied to guarded_open by the invokingcomputer program. The program should use a different guard value foreach file descriptor. The guard identifier can be recorded independentlyof the computer program, e.g., in a data table in memory, in associationwith the file descriptor, so that subsequent file operations can enforcethe guard by checking whether the same guard identifier is provided bythe computer program when the subsequent file operations are invoked,and generate errors without performing the actual operations if the sameguard identifier is not provided by the computer program. Such guarderrors can prevent execution of incorrect code, since program code thatprovides an incorrect guard identifier is likely to also provide anincorrect file descriptor, which can result in file data corruption.This guard checking serves as a validation of the computer program's useof file descriptors, e.g., by checking that the computer program hasproperly associated the guard identifiers with the guarded filedescriptors. If the guard identifier previously associated with the filedescriptor is not presented in subsequent operations on that filedescriptor, the computer program may be invoking the file operationusing a file descriptor that refers to a different file than the programintended. That is, an incorrect guard identifier can indicate that theprogram has not maintained a correct association between filedescriptors and guard identifiers. A guard error and stack trace can begenerated for use in analyzing a cause of the guard violation. Guarderrors can also include a stack trace that can be used to identify thelocation in the program code that invoked the file operationincorrectly, which can be useful in diagnosing and fixing the error inthe program code that erroneously invoked the file operation.

A method to guard against erroneous use of file descriptors in fileoperations is described. The method can be carried out by at least thefollowing. An attempt is made to perform a file operation on a filedescriptor, wherein the attempt comprises receiving the file descriptorand a guard identifier, determining whether the guard identifier isinvalid for the file descriptor, and generating a guard violation inresponse to the guard identifier being, invalid for the file descriptor.

Embodiments can include one or more of the following features.Determining whether the guard identifier is invalid for the filedescriptor can include searching a lookup table that associates validguard identifiers with file descriptors for one or more associationsbetween the file descriptor and the guard identifier, and determiningthat the guard identifier is invalid in response to the search findingno association between the file descriptor and the guard identifier inthe lookup table. Determining whether the guard identifier is invalidcan also include determining whether the file descriptor is applicableto the file operation, searching a lookup table that associates validguard identifiers with file descriptors for one or more associationsbetween the file descriptor and the guard identifier, and determiningthat the guard identifier is invalid in response to the file descriptorbeing applicable to the file operation and the search finding noassociation between the file descriptor and the guard identifier.

The method can also include determining that the file descriptor isapplicable to the file operation in response to the file operation beingassociated with the file descriptor in a lookup table that associatesfile descriptors with operations to which the file descriptors apply.The file operation can be selected from one or more of the followingoperations: closing a guarded file descriptor, reading from a guardedfile descriptor, writing to a guarded file descriptor, duplicating aguarded file descriptor, sending a guarded file descriptor over asocket, performing advisory locking on a guarded file descriptor,clearing a close-on-exec flag of a guarded file descriptor, or making aguarded file descriptor into a file port. Generating a guard violationcan include logging an error in accordance with the guard violation, andlogging the error can include logging pertinent state data about thefile descriptor and the operation attempted on the file descriptor. Thestate data can include a stack trace identifying a location in programcode of the attempt to perform the file operation. The error can includean exception code configured to describe the guarded operation, a guardidentifier, and a file descriptor number.

The method can also include generating a guard exception in accordancewith the guard violation, the guard exception including a guardexception code corresponding to the guarded operation. The exceptioncode can be identified in accordance with one or more of the followingguard exception codes: closing a guarded file descriptor, reading from aguarded file descriptor, writing to a guarded file descriptor,duplicating a guarded file descriptor, sending a guarded file descriptorover a socket, performing advisory locking on a guarded file descriptor,clearing a close-on-exec flag of a guarded file descriptor, making aguarded file descriptor into a file port, or invoking a guarded filedescriptor operation with in incorrect guard identifier.

The method can also include using the exception to capture a programstate in accordance with the guard violation, and using the capturedprogram state to analyze a cause of the guard violation. The method canalso include receiving a request to create a guard for the filedescriptor prior to attempting to perform the file operation, therequest including the file descriptor and the guard identifier, andassociating the guard identifier with the file descriptor in a lookuptable. The request can also include one or more operations to beguarded, and the method can also include associating the one or moreoperations with the file descriptor in the lookup table. The method canfurther include performing a guarded open operation on a file prior toattempting to perform the file operation, wherein performing the guardedopen operation includes doing the following atomically: performing anunguarded open operation on the file descriptor, and associating thefile descriptor with the guard identifier.

In another aspect, a method to guard against erroneous use of filedescriptors in file operations is described. The method can be carriedout by attempting to perform a file operation on a file descriptor,wherein the attempting comprises receiving, by the computer system, thefile descriptor and a guard identifier. The method further includesdetermining whether the guard identifier is valid for the filedescriptor, and performing, by the computer system, the file operationon the file descriptor in response to the guard identifier being validfor the file descriptor.

Embodiments can include one or more of the following features.Determining whether the guard identifier is invalid for the filedescriptor can include searching a lookup table that associates validguard identifiers with file descriptors for one or more associationsbetween the file descriptor and the guard identifier, and determiningthat the guard identifier is valid in response to the search finding anassociation between the file descriptor and the guard identifier in thelookup table. Determining whether the guard identifier is valid can alsoinclude determining whether the file descriptor is applicable to thefile operation, searching a lookup table that associates valid guardidentifiers with file descriptors for one or more associations betweenthe file descriptor and the guard identifier, and determining that theguard identifier is valid in response to the file descriptor beingapplicable to the file operation and the search finding an associationbetween the file descriptor and the guard identifier.

In a further embodiment, a non-transitory computer readable medium for acomputer system is described. The non-transitory computer readablemedium includes computer program code that causes the processor toreceive an invocation of a file operation on a file descriptor, receivea guard identifier associated with the invocation, determine that theguard identifier is associated with the file descriptor, the associationestablished prior to receiving the invocation, and perform the fileoperation on the file descriptor in response to determining that theguard identifier is associated with the file descriptor.

Embodiments can include one or more of the following features. Thecomputer program code that causes the processor to determine that theguard identifier is associated with the file descriptor can includecomputer program code that causes the processor to search a memory forone or more associations between the file descriptor and the guardidentifier and to determine that the guard identifier is associated withthe file descriptor in response to finding at least one associationbetween the file descriptor and the guard identifier in the memory.

In another embodiment, a system is described. The system includes atleast the following: a processing unit configured to attempt to performa file operation on a file descriptor, wherein the attempting comprisesreceiving, by the computer system, the file descriptor and a guardidentifier, determine that the guard identifier is associated with thefile descriptor by a lookup table, determine that the file operation isnot associated with the file descriptor by the lookup table, and preventexecution of the file operation in response to determining that the fileoperation is not associated with the guard identifier by the lookuptable.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The included drawings are for illustrative purposes and serve only toprovide examples of possible structures and arrangements for thedisclosed inventive apparatuses and methods for providing portablecomputing devices. These drawings in no way limit any changes in formand detail that may be made to the invention by one skilled in the artwithout departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Theembodiments will be readily understood by the following detaileddescription in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein likereference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a file descriptor guarding system inaccordance with the described embodiments.

FIG. 2 shows a representative flow chart for a guarded file descriptoropen process in accordance with the described embodiments.

FIG. 3 shows a representative flow chart for an implicitly guarded filedescriptor close process in accordance with the described embodiments.

FIG. 4 shows a representative flow chart for an explicitly guarded filedescriptor close process in accordance with the described embodiments.

FIG. 5 shows a representative computing system in accordance with thedescribed embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

A representative apparatus and application of methods according to thepresent application are described in this section. These examples arebeing provided solely to add context and aid in the understanding of thedescribed embodiments. It will thus be apparent to one skilled in theart that the described embodiments may be practiced without some or allof these specific details. In other instances, well known process stepshave not been described in detail in order to avoid unnecessarilyobscuring the described embodiments. Other applications are possible,such that the following examples should not be taken as limiting.

In the following detailed description, references are made to theaccompanying drawings, which form a part of the description and in whichare shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in accordancewith the described embodiments. Although these embodiments are describedin sufficient detail to enable one skilled in the art to practice thedescribed embodiments, it is understood that these examples are notlimiting; such that other embodiments may be used, and changes may bemade without departing from the spirit and scope of the describedembodiments.

Computer programs read, write, and otherwise manipulate files andnetwork sockets that are referred to using file descriptors. A filedescriptor can be understood as a handle used by a process running acomputer program to refer to an open file. For example, a process canpass a file name as a parameter to an open function or system call,which returns a file descriptor that can be used subsequently by theprocess to refer to the open file when performing operations such asread, write, close, and the like. A file descriptor is ordinarily validduring the lifetime of the process, and can be closed by the processusing a close operation, after which further operations using, the filedescriptor will not affect the file unless the file descriptor isre-opened. A file descriptor can be, for example, a numeric value suchas 0, 1, 2, or the like. The computer program stores the file descriptorin memory, e.g., in a variable, and supplies the same memory location orvariable when subsequently calling operations such as read, write, andclose on the file.

File descriptors are ordinarily closed automatically and retired whenthe file is closed or the process terminates. However, if a (parent)process wants to create another (child) process, a call to one of anumber of process-creation functions can be made. Some of theprocess-creation functions can include at least: fork( ) spawn( ) and soon. With many of these process-creation functions, the child can inheritthe file descriptors of the parent. For example, if the parent had afile descriptor 8 in use for a particular file when the parent createsthe child process, the child will also have file descriptor 8 in use forthat same file. In other words, the child's file descriptor will havebeen duplicated from the parent's file descriptor. By inheriting theparent's file descriptor, at the file system manager level, the parentand child can have the same open control block (note: file descriptorinheritance can be prevented by using fcntl( )). Therefore, in thedescribed embodiments, the child can inherit from the parent, theprotection afforded using a guarded file descriptor.

A file descriptor can be associated with a file object which includesinformation such as the mode in which the file was opened and an offsetpointer indicating where in the file the next operation will begin. Thefile descriptors are ordinarily managed by a process table for eachprocess and embodied as integer numbers sequentially assigned by theoperating system kernel. More particularly, as introduced above, filedescriptors are ordinarily small integers corresponding to a file thathas been opened by the current process. The integer identifies an openfile within the process. For example, standard input (stdin) is usuallyfile descriptor 0, standard output is 1, and standard error is 2. Itshould be noted that stdin as fd 0 can easily be muddled with a variablethat has simply been initialized to zero—a very common but unfortunateoccurrence when it also corresponds to a legal fd value. Additionalfiles opened by a process will then be assigned 3, 4, 5, and so forth.The name “file descriptor” is slightly deceptive, as sockets, pipes, anddevices are also referenced by file descriptors. Generally, a filedescriptor is an index for an entry in a kernel-resident data structurecontaining the details of all open files. It should also be noted thatthe file descriptor space can be kept quite dense (i.e., reusing lownumbered file descriptors can be required to conform to standards suchas POSIX 1003.1). By requiring a dense file descriptor space, thereremains the likelihood of amplifying the problems described herein.

Generally, an operating system (OS) can place limits on the number offile descriptors that a process may open. In addition to per-processlimits, an OS can also have a global limit on the number of filedescriptors that all its processes together may consume. For largeprograms that operate in a multi-threaded environment, the small pool offile descriptors can be used by more than one thread and can thereforebe considered a shared resource in that the number of integers that canbe associated with a file descriptor can be much less than the number ofoperations that require a file descriptor. In this way, the sharing offile descriptors can be problematic in situations (such as in amulti-threaded environment and/or large programs) where one threadinadvertently uses a file descriptor already in use.

There is a possibility that a computer program will use file descriptorsincorrectly, e.g., by supplying an incorrect file descriptor as aparameter to a file operation. Programs that maintain multiple files areparticularly susceptible to this problem, since an error in the programcode can result in a file descriptor that refers to one file being usedin an operation on a different file. For example, if a file descriptorrefers to a database file, but a file write operation that writeslogging information intended for a log file is mistakenly invoked withthe database file's descriptor, then the log file information is storedin the database file, which results in an invalid, unusable databasefile because the log information is not in the proper format for data inthe database file. In some cases, if a system file becomes corruptbecause of such incorrect modification, the effects of the erroneousfile operation can be severe, such as a system functioning incorrectlyor crashing.

With the limited number of available integers that can be used as filedescriptor values, operations such as write, read, close, can be easy toaccidentally confuse or misuse. File descriptors can cover the entirescope of the program and can be used locally but can also be used tomake global changes. For example, prior to initiating some operationwithin the program, one thread might close all or some critical subsetof the file descriptors in the process. However, this action can havesome adverse side effect such as undoing all file locks. This undoing,of all file locks can result in file corruption. For example, if part ofa program is writing error logs to a file, and if the file is closedwithout the error logger knowing that the file has been closed, then theerror logger is likely to start writing error information to the file,resulting in over-written data in the file and corrupting the file. Oneof the problems with conventional systems is that for large programs,these types of “bugs” can go unnoticed for a substantial amount of timeand only become symptomatic when system files or other important fileshave been affected. Furthermore, the ordinary file operations such asread, write, and close, do not necessarily generate errors when anincorrect file descriptor is supplied, so erroneous use of filedescriptors can be difficult to detect.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a file descriptor guarding system inaccordance with the described embodiments. A computer system 102includes application program code 104 and a file descriptor guardingframework 106, both of which can be, for example, program codeinstructions that are encoded on a computer-readable medium andexecutable by a processor of the computer system 102. The guardingframework 106 can be implemented in a programming language such as C,C++, Objective C, Java™, or the like. The framework 106 provides aguarded file descriptor application programming interface (API), whichincludes program code functions that implement guarded file descriptorsand can be called, i.e., invoked, by computer programs such as theapplication code 104. The application code 104 ordinarily executes inthe same operating system process as at least a portion of the guardingframework 106. Portions of the guarding framework can also be located inoperating system libraries, the operating system kernel, or in otherportions of the computer system.

The file guard framework 106 includes functions 110, 130, 140 thatcorrespond to operations that can be performed on files and otherdata-related entities, such as communication channels (e.g., networksockets). These file operations include opening, reading, from, writingto, and closing files, as well as other types of operations on filedescriptors, such as accessing metadata, locking, duplicating filedescriptors, and so on. The file operations are performed, subject tocertain conditions as described herein, by the computer programfunctions 110, 130, 140 of the file guarding framework 106 inconjunction with the operating system. The functions 110, 130, 140include compatibility functions 140, such as open 142, close 144, dup2,read, write, and so on, which have the same calling interfaces as theordinary file access functions of the same names, but enforce guardedfile descriptors. The compatibility functions 140 are referred to hereinas “implicitly guarded functions,” since they are subject torestrictions imposed by guarded file descriptors, but do not haveexplicit guard-related parameters, and can fail with errors when invokedon guarded file descriptors.

In one aspect, explicitly guarded functions 110 can perform theirassociated file operations on guarded file descriptors, subject torestrictions imposed by the guarded file descriptors, such as onlyexecuting the corresponding operation (e.g., read, write, close, or thelike) if a valid guard identifier is provided as a parameter when anexplicitly guarded function 110 is invoked on a guarded file descriptor.The explicitly guarded functions 110 accept a “guard identifier”parameter that is used by the file guarding framework 106 to determinewhether to allow the explicitly guarded functions 110 to actuallyperform their associated file operations. The explicitly guardedfunctions include guarded_open, guarded_close, guarded_dup2,guarded_read, guarded_write, and so on.

In one or more embodiments, although the explicitly guarded functions110 can fail with errors when invoked on guarded file descriptors, guardidentifiers can be passed to the explicitly guarded functions to allowthe operations to succeed. The explicitly guarded functions 110 and thecompatibility functions 140 check whether the file descriptors on whichthey are invoked are guarded, and, if so, whether the guard applies tothe specific operation. If a file descriptor is guarded (i.e., has beenassociated with a guard identifier) and applies to the operation beinginvoked (e.g., close), then the explicitly guarded functions 110 checkif the guard identifier is valid (i.e., matches the guard identifierassociated with the file descriptor), and, if so, perform theircorresponding operations (e.g., closing the file) by invoking thecorresponding underlying function 130 (e.g., do_close 134, or do_open132 for an open operation). The underlying functions 130 are not exposedto the application program code 104, so that the application 104 doesnot directly invoke the underlying, functions 130. The underlyingfunctions 130 implement the actual file operations, such as closingfiles. In one example, the underlying functions 130 do not check guardsand do not generate guard errors, as the guard checking is performedbefore the underlying functions 130 are called by the framework 106. Theunderlying functions 130 can be implemented using the correspondingsystem calls such as open(2), close(2), and so on, but one or more ofthe underlying functions can have different names (do_open, and so on),since the system call names are used by the compatibility functions 140to enforce guarded file descriptors for invocations made by theapplication 104, at least for the system calls for which guardedoperations are defined. In other embodiments, the system calls such asopen, close, and so on, are not guarded, and applications that wish touse guarded file descriptor features are expected to use the explicitlyguarded functions 110 instead of the system calls.

In one or more embodiments, the application program code 104 invokes theexplicitly guarded functions 110 using function calls in whichparameters 108 are passed to the explicitly guarded functions 110. Theparameters 108 include an indication of the operation to be invoked(which identifies the particular function 110 being called, such asguarded_open 112 or guarded_close 114), the file descriptor, and theguard identifier. The functions 110 pass these values as parameters 116to a guard verifier 120, which determines whether the operation to beinvoked is permitted according to the parameters 116 and a guardidentifier 126 that is associated with the same file descriptor value124 in a guard table 122. The guard table 122 also associates guardflags 128 with the file descriptor, e.g., CLOSE, READ, and the like, aswell as combinations of multiple flags, as described in Table 1. In oneexample, the values in the guard table are created by the guarded_openfunction 112, which passes the file descriptor being opened (fd), theguard identifier, and the guardflags (which it receives as parametersfrom the application program code 104) to the guard verifier 120. Theguard verifier searches the guard table 122 for a row having the filedescriptor value (fd). If an entry (e.g., a row) is found in the guardtable 122 having a file descriptor value 124 equal to the fd parameter,then the file descriptor is a guarded file descriptor, and the verifier120 determines whether to permit the operation, or to prevent theoperation by generating and/or returning an error or exception 136 asdescribed below. If the value of the fd parameter is not present in thefile descriptor column of the guard table 122, then fd is not a guardedfile descriptor, then there is no guard checking to be done, and theguard verifier 122 returns an OK status, thus allowing the fileoperation to execute and access one or more of the files 138. Controlpasses back to the explicitly guarded functions 110, which execute theoperation and return an OK status (or other status generated by theoperation) to the application program code 104.

If the file descriptor in the parameters 116 is a guarded filedescriptor, e.g., there is an entry in the guard table 122 having a thedescriptor value 124 equal to the fd parameter, but the file descriptordoes not apply to the requested operation, i.e., the operation in theparameters 116 is not in the guard flags column of the row that containsthe fd, then the operation is permitted regardless of the guard ID 126in the guard table 122, and an OK status is returned to the function110. If the file descriptor on which the operation is requested doesapply to that operation, i.e., the operation is in the guard flagscolumn 128 of the row that contains the fd, then the operation on one ormore of the files 138 is permitted if the guard_ID specified in theparameters 116 of the function matches the guard ID 126 stored in thatrow of the guard table 122, and the verifier 120 returns an OK status;otherwise, the guard_ID in the parameters 116 does not match that guardID 126, in which case the operation is prevented and an error 136 isreturned by the verifier 120. If the verifier 120 returns an error 136,then when control passes back to the explicitly guarded functions 110,the functions 110 also return an error 148 (based or having the samevalue as the error 136, but possibly having a different representationor structure) to the application program code 104 without executing therequested file operation.

In one or more embodiments, when the verifier 120 returns an error 136,the function that was called (e.g., one of the functions 110, 130, 140)returns an error status 148, e.g., by returning the value −1 and settingan error number status to EGUARDED. Further, the error 136 can cause anexception of type EXC_GUARD to be generated with a flag value set tokGUARD_EXC_CLOSE. Other actions are also possible in response to theerror 136. For example, a signal can also be raised, the kernel cangenerate a log warning message, and the program 104 can exit in responseto the error 136 (which the program 104 receives from the functions 110,130, 140 as an error indicator 112). The error indicators 136, 148 canbe represented as any of these types of errors or exceptions. It shouldbe noted that another flavor of exception can result if the wrong guardis used, in the form of an EXC_GUARD exception with thekGUARD_EXC_MISMATCH flag. Furthermore, while EGUARDED is a useful anddistinct error number for the purposes of this description, if theexception is caught or ignored, an overloaded error code will bereturned, specifically EPERM. In this way, EGUARDED can be mapped to apre-existing error code.

The compatibility functions 140 can consult the guard verifier 120 todetermine if the file descriptor specified in parameters 150 is guardedand applies to the operation specified in the parameters 150, 146 in away similar to that described above for the explicitly guarded functions110, but the implicitly guarded functions 140 do not pass the guardidentifier to the guard verifier 120, so invocations of the implicitlyguarded functions 140 on guarded file descriptors will fail. Thus, if animplicit function 140 is invoked on a file descriptor that is protectedby a guard identifier, the verifier 120 returns an error or exception136, and the compatibility function 140 in turn returns an error 148without executing the requested operation. Otherwise, if the filedescriptor is not protected by a guard identifier, the requestedoperation is permitted, so the compatibility functions execute therequested operation and return an OK status (or other status generatedby the operation) via the parameters 150 to the application 104.

In one or more embodiments, the guarded file descriptors disclosedherein can be used in a computer program to detect the use of erroneousfile descriptor values in file operations performed by the program, andfurther to identify the locations in the program code at which the fileoperations are invoked with the erroneous file descriptors. As describedabove, a file descriptor is a parameter to the file operations, and canidentify the particular file on which the operations are to beperformed. In one aspect, a “guarded file descriptor” is a filedescriptor that is associated with a “guard identifier,” which can beunderstood as a value that is unique to that file descriptor. A computerprogram can create a guarded file descriptor using, for example, aprogram code operation with a name such as “guarded_open” that opens afile, creates a file descriptor for the file, associates a given guardidentifier with the file descriptor, and provides the file descriptor tothe invoking computer program. The value for the guard identifier can bea numeric value, and can be supplied to guarded_open by the invokingcomputer program, or can be generated by guarded_open. The guardidentifier can be recorded, e.g., in a data table in memory, inassociation with the file descriptor, so that subsequent file operationscan enforce the guard by checking whether the same guard identifier isprovided when the subsequent file operations are invoked. Subsequentfile operations that use the file descriptor can require that the sameguard identifier be provided when the operations are invoked, and cangenerate errors without performing the actual operations if the sameguard identifier is not provided. Such guard errors can preventexecution of incorrect code, since program code that provides anincorrect guard identifier is likely to also be providing an incorrectfile descriptor, which can result in file data corruption. The guarderrors can also include a stack trace that can be used to identify thelocation in the program code that invoked the file operationincorrectly, which can be useful in diagnosing and fixing the error inthe program code that caused the incorrect file operation.

In this way, by providing a guarded close (or other appropriate guardedcall), that can only be performed if an appropriate unique identifier isprovided, such erroneous closes can be prevented. Furthermore, when anattempt to close a file fails due to the fact that only a guarded closeinvoked with an appropriate unique identifier can close the file, then asynchronous exception can be generated that allows capture in the stacktrace where the guard violation is detected. If the exception isignored, an interface can return an error code, and the operation (e.g.the close) fails. In this way, the specific portion (i.e., location) ofthe code that attempted to close the file erroneously can be identified.In this way, not only can the offending code be identified, but thelikelihood of adversely affecting other parts of the program can bereduced since the number of erroneous closes (or other operations) canbe substantially reduced along with the associated file descriptors.

In another aspect, guarded file descriptors can be configured to applyto some types of file operations but not to other types. The specificoperations to which a guarded file descriptor applies can be specifiedwhen the guarded file descriptor is created using a flags parameter orother technique for specifying a set of operations. For example, if aguarded file descriptor is configured to apply to the file closeoperation but not to other operations, then a file close operationinvoked using the guarded file descriptor will fail if the appropriateguard identifier is not supplied, but other operations, e.g., readingdata from the file, will succeed regardless of whether the appropriateguard identifier is supplied.

The existing ordinary file descriptor-based functions, e.g., open, read,write, dup2, and so on, do not accept guard identifiers as parameters,so, in one or more embodiments, the ordinary functions fail when invokedwith a guarded file descriptor. In other embodiments, the ordinaryfunctions can be extended to accept guard parameters, e.g., usingimplicit parameters such as global variables or environment variables.For simplicity of explanation, the ordinary functions are describedherein as not accepting guard parameters, and therefore not beingcapable of executing successfully when invoked on guarded filedescriptors that apply to those functions.

In one or more embodiments, a set of guarded file descriptor functionsis provided for use by application programs. These functions include aguarded_open function, which opens a file and creates a guarded filedescriptor by associating a specified file descriptor with a given guardidentifier, and several “explicitly guarded” functions for using theguarded file descriptor. The explicitly guarded functions includeguarded_read, guarded_write, guarded_dup2, guarded_advlock, and others.Each of the explicitly guarded functions corresponds to an ordinary filedescriptor-based function (e.g., read, write, dup2) with the addition ofan explicit guard identifier parameter. The explicitly guarded functionsaccept a guard identifier parameter. Each of the functions only performsits file descriptor operation if the correct guard identifier isprovided to the function when it is invoked. If the correct value is notprovided, the function will fail with a guard error or exception (unlessthe guarded file descriptor does not apply to the operation type, asdescribed below). In contrast, the ordinary file descriptor-basedfunctions do not have a guard identifier parameter, and are thereforereferred to as implicitly guarded functions. Guard checking is performedby the implicitly guarded functions in the same way as for theexplicitly guarded functions, so when an implicitly guarded function isinvoked on a file descriptor created by guarded_open, the function failswith an error if the guarded file descriptor applies to the type offunction being invoked (i.e. the file descriptor is associated with thetype of operation that is being invoked), since the implicitly guardedfunctions do not have guard identifier parameters, and the guardidentifier therefore cannot be specified when the implicitly guardedfunctions are invoked. The explicitly guarded file operations accept aguard identifier as a parameter. In other embodiments, the explicitlyguarded operations can accept the guard identifier as an implicitparameter, such as a global variable, environment variable, or by someother data passing technique.

As introduced above, the guarded file descriptor can apply to, i.e.,guard, some or all of the file operations, such as the close, read,write, and dup2 operations, or just the close operation, or any otherspecified combination. The file operations that are to be guarded can bespecified by, for example, supplying a guard flags parameter to the openoperation, or using other ways to associate a set of operations with afile descriptor. In one example, the guarded_open function has aparameter named “guardflags” that specifies the operations to be guardedby the file descriptor created by the open operation. The guardflagsparameter can be a numeric value in which each bit (i.e., flag) positioncorresponds to an operation in the set of possible operations. The setof guarded operations can be specified using, for example, a numericvalue that has a bit that corresponds to each guardable operation, withthe bits for the operations that actually are to be guarded being set to1, and the other bits being set to 0. Flag names are provided for theoperations, e.g., GUARD_CLOSE, GUARD_READ, GUARD_DUP2, and the like,which can be combined using an “or” operator. For example, the close anddup2 operations can be specified by invoking the guarded_open functionas follows:

guarded_open(pathname, fileflags, guardid, GUARD_CLOSE|GUARD_DUP2);

Thus, in one embodiment, the program can specify which type(s) ofoperation(s), e.g., open, close, read, write, duplicate, fcntl, and soon, are to require a valid guard value, and the specified type ofoperation will be associated with the file descriptor in such as way asto require a valid guard value for the associated operation type(s). Forexample, a guarded file descriptor can be created using guarded_open,and the particular types of operations that are to be guarded can bespecified in a “guardflags” parameter to the guarded_open function. Inthis example, operations of types that are not specified in theguarded_open call are not guarded, and can be executed without a guardidentifier. An example list of guardable operations that can bespecified in the guardflags parameter, with descriptions of theoperations to which the guards apply, is shown below in Table 1.

In other embodiments, e.g., if the programming language supportsfunction overloading, the explicitly guarded functions can have the samenames as the ordinary (implicitly guarded) functions, and bedistinguished by having different parameter signatures. For example, theexplicitly guarded open function can have the signature open(char*pathname, int flags, guardid_t guardid, int guardflags), in which thedifference in parameter names and types distinguishes the guardedoperation from the ordinary operation (e.g., open(char *pathname, intflags)).

To use guarded file descriptors, a computer program such as anapplication program invokes the guarded open function (e.g.,guarded_open) to open a file and associate a guard identifier value withthe file descriptor. The guard identifier can be provided by thecomputer program, or can be generated by the guarded_open function andprovided to the computer program as a result of the function. In otherembodiments, the computer program itself can associate a guard valuewith the file descriptor after the guarded open function is complete,e.g., to create a guarded file descriptor based on a file descriptorcreated by a portion of program code that is impractical to modify.

In one or more embodiments, the computer program stores the guard valuein memory in association with the file descriptor, e.g., in a lookuptable if multiple file descriptors are in use simultaneously, andprovides both the file descriptor and the guard value as parameters tosubsequent invocations of the explicitly guarded functions to read orwrite data, duplicate file descriptors, close files, and the like. Sincethe ordinary implicitly guarded read, write, close, and duplicationfunctions do not take guard values as parameters, the implicitly guardedfunctions generate an error without performing any file operations wheninvoked on a file descriptor that has previously been associated with aguard value (and, in one embodiment, the type of operation being invokedif the file descriptor is associated with specific operation types thatwere passed to guarded_open).

When invoking explicitly guarded functions for operations that werespecified in the guardflags parameter to guarded_open, a programprovides the guard identifier along with the corresponding filedescriptor as parameters. The guarded file operation determines whetherthe guarded file descriptor is associated with the operation type of theinvoked operation according to a guard table, and if so, verifies thatthe guard value provided by the program matches (e.g., is the same as orequal to) the guard value that was associated with the file descriptorwhen the file was opened, again according to the guard table. If theprovided guard value is the same as the previously associated guardvalue, then the operation is permitted to execute.

Checking for the correct guard value addresses the problem of filedescriptor values being erroneously specified and reused, because use ofthe incorrect guard value can be detected and reported as an error. Thefile descriptor guarding framework, a portion of which may be located inthe operating system, checks the ordinary file descriptor functions,such as close, read, and write, to ensure that guarded file descriptorsare only usable when the correct guard value is provided.

As indicated above, if a guarded file descriptor applies to an operationand the correct guard identifier is not provided to the function thatinvokes the operation, then the operation is not permitted, and an erroris generated. That is, the function returns an error status withoutperforming the requested operation. By default, the error (or exception)causes the program to halt, and can also cause a stack trace to begenerated. In one embodiment, the guarded function, e.g., guarded_close,returns a value that indicates an error has occurred, and the callingprogram can retrieve details of the error, such as the type of error(e.g., invalid guard value), the expected and supplied guard values, astack trace of the call in which the error occurred, and so on. In oneembodiment, the default behavior when such an error occurs is for theprogram to be halted and details of the error be made available (e.g., astack trace and other information, as described above), so that thesource of the erroneous file descriptor operation can be identified.

Other behaviors are possible when the operation is not permitted becauseof an incorrect guard identifier. For example, the program can specifythat guard errors are to be provided to the program, which will handlethe errors, e.g., ignore the errors under certain conditions, attempt torecover from the errors under other conditions, and so on. The stacktrace generated by the guard mismatch can be used to identify thelocation in the program code at which the operation that caused themismatch was invoked.

The behavior of the program when guard errors occur can be implementedusing signal handlers, exception handlers, or other error handlers.Since the requested file operation is not performed when a guardedfunction is invoked without the correct guard value, the program shouldnot ordinarily continue execution without handling the error, sincecontinued execution of the program may result in incorrect behavior,data corruption, or the like. However, the program can use errorhandlers as described above to catch invalid guard errors and continueexecution, presumably handling the error in some way so that executioncan safely continue. The guarded functions can return error status by,for example, raising an operating system signal, raising an exception,writing an error to a log file, or by taking some other action.

In one or more embodiments, a set of functions is provided for creating,using, and closing guarded file descriptors. These functions includeguarded_open, guarded_dup2, guarded_read, guarded_write, andguarded_close, which are referred to herein as “explicitly guarded”functions, and perform operations similar to those of their ordinarycounterparts (open, dup2, read, write, close, and so on), except theguarded functions each take a guard value parameter (named guardid), andthe guarded_open function also takes a guard flags parameter (namedguardflags), which specifies the operations that are to be guarded forthe file descriptor created by the guarded_open call. That is, not alloperations on file descriptors need be guarded, and the program canspecify a subset of file descriptor operations (e.g., only closeoperations) that are to be guarded. In one or more embodiments, theordinary counterparts (open, dup2, read, write, close, and so on) areextended to enforce the rules of guarded file descriptors, but theordinary counterparts cannot perform operations on guarded filedescriptors because the ordinary counterparts do not have guardidparameters. The ordinary counterparts are therefore referred to as“implicitly guarded” functions. The guard functions are described inmore detail below.

In one embodiment, the guarded_open function opens or creates a file,and creates a guarded file descriptor that is guarded for a specifiedset of operations. The guarded_open function opens the file and createsthe guarded file descriptor in a single atomic operation that is notinterruptible by other file descriptor operations. That is, theguarded_open function atomically opens the file and creates the guardedfile descriptor so that other threads or processes cannot executebetween the time that the open bgis and the guarded file descriptorcreation is complete. The function signature for guarded_open is

-   -   int guarded_open(const char *pathname, int flags, const uuid_t        *guardid, uint_t guardflags [, mode_t mode]);

The parameters are similar to those of the ordinary open(2) system call,i.e., the name of the file to open and flags that affect how the file iscreated and used, and an optional mode flag that defines filepermissions if a file is being created. The guardid parameter is theguard value to be used in the guarded open operation. The data type ofthe guardid parameter is shown as uuid_t (i.e., a 128-bit QUID), butother types are possible, such as a long integer or a pointer to anarray of bytes or characters. The guardflags parameter is an unsignedinteger value that specifies the operations that are to be guarded forthe file descriptor that is being created by the guarded_open call. Theguardflags parameter can be specified by combining, the identifiers forthe operations that are to be guarded with or operators. For example, ifthe close and dup operations are to be guarded, the guardflags parameteris specified as GUARD_CLOSE|GUARD_DUP. The guarded_open call returns thenewly created file descriptor as a result, or −1 if an error occurred.In other embodiments, the guarded_open function can generate the guardedvalue instead of receiving the guarded value as a parameter. In stillother embodiments, an application program can call the ordinary open(2)system call to create a file descriptor, and then call an add_guardfunction that creates a guard for the file descriptor, although theprogram should ensure that operations in other threads or processes donot simultaneously occur, as an inconsistent state could result. In oneaspect, the guarded_open function itself is not guarded by a guardedfile descriptor, because guarded_open creates file descriptors, and sothere is no GUARD_OPEN flag. In other embodiments, the open function canbe guarded, e.g., to detect calls to the open function on filedescriptors that are already open, in which case the GUARD_OPEN flag canbe specified in the guardflags parameter.

In one embodiment, the guarded_dup2 function duplicates a guarded filedescriptor to produce another guarded file descriptor that is guarded bythe same guard value. The ordinary dup2(2) does not support guards, andfails if called on a guarded file descriptor. The function signature forguarded_dup2 is:

int guarded_dup2(int oldfd, const uuid_t *guardid, int newfd);

The guarded_dup2 function behaves similarly to the dup2(2) system call,creating a new file descriptor with the given newfd value and returningthe file descriptor value, except that the newly-created descriptor isalso guarded via the same guardid, and the new file descriptor inheritsthe close-on-exec and close-on-fork settings from the originaldescriptor oldfd. If oldfd is a guarded file descriptor (e.g., GUARD_DUPwas specified when oldfd was created), then guarded_dup2 compares thevalue of the guardid parameter to the guard identifier associated witholdfd. If the guardid parameter is not equal to the guard identifierassociated with oldfd, then guarded_dup2 fails and returns an error.

In one embodiment, the guarded_socket function opens a socket andreturns a guarded file descriptor for the socket. The guarded_socketfunction is similar to the guarded_open function, except thatguarded_socket opens a socket and guarded_open opens a file, in otherembodiments, guarded_open may open a socket as well as a file.

In one embodiment, the guarded_close function closes a file similarly tothe ordinary close(2) system call, but guarded_close can be used toclose guarded file descriptors. The ordinary close(2) does not supportguards, and fails if called on a guarded file descriptor. The functionsignature for guarded_close is:

int guarded_close(int fd, const uuid_t *guardid);

The guarded_close function behaves similarly to the close(2) systemcall, but the guarded_close function can be used to close guarded filedescriptors.

Certain operations performed by fcntl(2) can also be guarded, such asmanipulation of the file descriptor when performing file and recordlocking. The operation of passing a file descriptor between processescan also be guarded, e.g., by causing the relevant sendmsg(2) call thatattempts to send the file descriptor via a Unix domain socket without avalid guard value to fail with error number (errno) EGUARDED. Thecreation of a fileport from a descriptor can also be guarded, e.g., bycausing the fileport_makeport(2) call that attempts to create thefileport without a guard value to fail with errno EGUARDED.

In one embodiment, the passing of file descriptors to child processes isnot permitted when the close operation is guarded. That is, O_CLOEXECmust be specified as one of the flags in the guarded_open call when theclose operation is guarded (e.g., guarded_open is called with guardflagsthat have the GUARD_CLOSE option set), so that the guarded filedescriptor will be closed when an exec(2) call that creates a childprocess is executed.

In one or more embodiments, functions can be provided to convertnon-guarded file descriptors to guarded file descriptors. For example,an add_guard(fd, guard_ID) function can be provided to add a guard to afile descriptor created by an ordinary open call, and remove_guard(fd,guard_ID) can be provided to remove a guard from a guarded filedescriptor, thereby converting the guarded file descriptor to anordinary, i.e., unguarded, file descriptor.

TABLE 1 Operation flag Description GUARD_CLOSE Guard the file closeoperation. Explicit calls to close(2) on a guarded file guard will failwith EGUARDED and will generate an EXC_GUARD exception with flagkGUARD_EXC_CLOSE. The descriptor is immutably set to be close-on-exec,and close-on- fork. Attempts to reset the FD_CLOEXEC flag using fcntl(2)will fail with EGUARDED. Explicit close operations specified viaposix_spawn_file_actions_addclose( ) with a GUARD_CLOSE- guarded fd willbe honored, but only because the descriptor is implicitly markedclose-on-exec. Implicit close operations via exit(2) behave as if therewere no guard. Implicit close operations via close-on--exec orclose-on-fork behaviors at fork( )/vfork( )/execve( )/pos ix_s pawn( )time behave as if there were no guard. Explicit attempts to callguarded_close(2) with the correct uuid behave as if there were no guard.Explicit inherit operations specified viaposix_spawn_file_actions_addinherit_np( ) with a GUARD_CLOSE guarded fdwill cause the relevant posix_spawn(2) invocation to return EGUARDED.Attempts to reset the FD_CLOEXEC flag using fcntl will fail withEGUARDED and will generate an EXC_GUARD exception with flagkGUARD_EXC_NOCLOEXEC. GUARD_DUP Guard the file descriptor duplicationoperations. Explicit attempts to call dup(2), dup2(2), fcntl(2) withsubcodes F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC and F_DUPFD or posix_spawn(2) after an explicitposix_spawn_file_actions_adddup2( ) on a guarded file descriptor willfail with EGUARDED. GUARD_SOCKET_IPC Guard the sending of filedescriptors to other processes by sendmsg. An attempt to send a guardedfile descriptor via a Unix domain socket to another process will causethe relevant sendmsg(2) to fail with errno EGUARDED. Violations thatresult in the EGUARDED state will generate an EXC_GUARD exception withflag kGUARD_EXC_SOCKET_IPC GUARD_FILEPORT Guard the creation offileports from file descriptors using fileport_makeport. An attempt tocreate a fileport from a descriptor using fileport_makeport(2) will failwith errno EGUARDED. This will implicitly prevent the descriptor beingsent to another process via a mach message (and implicitly, xpcmessage.) In the initial implementation, GUARD_CLOSE must be specifiedwith all of GUARD_DUP, GUARD_SOCKET_IPC and GUARD_FILEPORT set, alsoO_CLOEXEC must be specified; these restrictions may be relaxed in afuture implementation. Violations that result in the EGUARDED state willgenerate an EXC_GUARD exception, with flag kGUARD_EXC_FILEPORT.GUARD_READ Guard read operations. The file descriptor cannot be read viaread(2), readv(2), pread(2), aio_read(2) or sendfile(2). If attempted,the operation fails with error EGUARDED. Data may be read from the filedescriptor using guarded_pread(2) with the descriptor guardid value iffthe uuid matches, and the ‘flags’ setting would allow that e.g. O_RDONLYor O_RDWR. GUARD_WRITE Guard write operations. The file descriptorcannot be written via write(2), writev(2), pwrite(2), or aio_write(2).If attempted, the operation fails with errno EGUARDED. Data may bewritten to the file descriptor using guarded_pwrite(2) with thedescriptor guardid value iff the id matches, and the ‘flags’ settingwould allow that e.g. O_WRONLY or O_RDWR. GUARD_META Guard operationsthat can change file metadata. DATA Meta-data for the underlying filecan no longer be manipulated via this descriptor i.e. fchmod(2),futimes(2), fchown(2) etc. all return EGUARDED (though the underlyingmetadata may change as a side- effect of other syscalls by this thread,or because of other activity on the system.) GUARD_ADVLOCK Guard fileand record locking attempts by the fcntl operation. The file descriptorcannot be manipulated via fcntl(2) when performing file and recordlocking. guarded_advlock_np( ) is introduced to allow a set ofF_SETLK/F_SETLKW/F_GETLK operations to be directly expressed.

For example, a guarded file descriptor for a file with a given path namecan be created by opening the file with the guarded_open function asshown below. The guard value, named guardid, is created by calling agenerate_uuid( ) function that creates a unique value (i.e., a UUID).The guard flags parameter, which specifies the operations that are to beguarded for this file descriptor, are created as a numeric value thathas bits set for the read, write, close, and duplicate operations.

-   -   int guardid=generate_uuid( );    -   int guardflags=READ|WRITE|CLOSE|DUPLICATE;    -   int guardedfd=guarded_open(pathname, flags, guardid,        guardflags);

Subsequent calls to read, write, close, and duplicate (e.g., dup2)operations on the file descriptor guardedfd will result in an errorunless the guardid value is passed to the appropriate guarded versionsof the operations (e.g., guarded_read, guarded_write, guarded_close, andguarded_dup2). For example, guarded_close can be invoked as follows:

-   -   int result=guarded_close(guardedfd, guardid);

The guarded_close function call closes the file if the value of guardidis the same value that was passed to the guarded_open call that createdguardedfd. Other guarded file operations use guards similarly, e.g.,guarded_write, guarded_read, guarded_dup2, guarded_fcntl). Invoking theordinary implicitly-guarded close(2) operation on guardedfd as shownbelow results in an error, with guardedfd not actually being closed,because the guard value (guardid) is not specified:

-   -   int result=close(guardedfd);

In one or more embodiments, guard_ID can be a pointer, in which thepointer should be non-NULL. The value of the guard identifier is notinterpreted by the guarded file descriptor functions beyond comparisonto other guard identifiers. The data type of the guard identifier may bea uuid_t universal unique identifier. In one embodiment, guard_ID can becode signature of the code issuing the open that can be found if andwhen an error occurs.

FIG. 2 shows a representative flow chart for a guarded file descriptoropen process 200 in accordance with the described embodiments. Process200 can be implemented as, for example, computer program code encoded ona computer readable medium and executable by a processor of a computersystem. Process 200 corresponds to and can be carried out by calling aguarded_open function 112 and can be carried out by calling theguarded_open function 112 at 202, e.g., from application program code104, to create a guarded file descriptor 124. Block 204 receives orgenerates a guard identifier. Block 208 invokes the unguarded do_openfunction 132 to perform the open operation. The do_open function 132opens a file using the given file descriptor, independently of anyguards. Bock 210 records the guard identifier as the guard identifierand guard flags value received by the guarded_open function as theguardflags 128 in association with the file descriptor 124 received bythe guarded_open function at block 202. For example, block 210 stores a(file descriptor, guard_ID, guardflags) tuple in the guard table 122 ina memory and/or other storage medium of the computer system, and theprocess ends. The guard identifier 126 can subsequently be used to grantaccess to the files 138 referenced by the file descriptors 124 to theexplicitly guarded functions 110 for the operations specified in theguard flags 128.

FIG. 3 shows a representative flow chart for an implicitly guarded filedescriptor operation process in accordance with the describedembodiments. Process 300 can be implemented as, for example, computerprogram code encoded on a computer readable medium and executable by aprocessor of a computer system. Process 300 can describe an attempt toperform a file access operation on a file descriptor using a normal,i.e., implicitly guarded, function 140 such as a system close function144. In this case, process 300 can be used to capture an exception andgenerate an error code by the implicitly guarded function 140. Process300 can be carried out when an application program attempts to close afile descriptor using the implicitly guarded function 140 such as thesystem close function 144 at 302. Block 304 determines whether the filedescriptor is a guarded file descriptor. The determination at 304 can bemade by searching a guard table 122 for the file descriptor anddetermining if a guard identifier 126 is associated with the filedescriptor 124. If there is no record of the file descriptor, i.e., thefile descriptor is not present in the file descriptor column 124 of theguard table 122, then the file descriptor is not a guarded filedescriptor in the current operating system process, and controltransfers to block 310. Alternatively, if there is a record of the filedescriptor in the guard table 122, e.g., an association exists betweenthe file descriptor 124 and a guard identifier 126, then controltransfers to block 306.

Block 306 determines whether the guarded file descriptor that was passedto the close function at block 302 applies to the requested operation(e.g., close) by determining whether the flag corresponding to theoperation (e.g., GUARD_CLOSE) is set in the recorded guardflags 128associated with the file descriptor 124. If block 306 determines thatthe flag is set, i.e., the guarded file descriptor applies to the closeoperation, then block 308 generates a guard error or exception 136,e.g., by raising a signal or returning an error code or exception fromthe close operation. If block 304 determines that the file descriptor isnot guarded, or block 306 determines that the operation flag is not set,so that the guard is not applicable to the operation, then block 310invokes the unguarded do_close function 134 to close the file descriptorwithout any further guard checking.

FIG. 4 shows a representative flow chart for an explicitly guarded filedescriptor close process in accordance with the described embodiments.Process 300 can be implemented as, for example, computer program codeencoded on a computer readable medium and executable by a processor of acomputer system. Process 300 can describe an attempt to perform a fileaccess operation on a file descriptor using an explicitly guarded,function 110 such as a guarded_close function 114. At 402, when aprogram executing in an operating system process wants to perform theoperation, the process invokes the appropriate one of the explicitlyguarded functions 110 on the file's file descriptor, and is expected tosupply the guard identifier associated with the file descriptor as aparameter to the function. At 404, a determination is made if the filedescriptor is guarded. The determination can involve determining whetheror not the file descriptor is associated with a guard identifier. Thedetermination can be made by searching the guard table 122 for an entryin the file descriptor column 124 that matches the file descriptorreceived in the fd parameter 116, and determining if there is a guardidentifier 126 associated with, e.g., in the same table row as, the filedescriptor 124 in the table that matches the received fd parameter 116.If the file descriptor is not guarded, e.g., if there is no record ofthe received file descriptor in the guard table 122, then block 410invokes the unguarded do_close operation 134 to close the filedescriptor without checking any guards.

Otherwise, if block 404 determines that the file descriptor is guarded,block 406 determines whether the guarded file descriptor applies to therequested operation (e.g., close). Block 406 can, for example, check ifthe bit that corresponds to the requested operation is set in theguardflags value associated with the file descriptor that was passed toblock 402. If the bit is set, then the guarded file descriptor fdapplies to the requested operation, and block 408 is invoked todetermine if the incoming guard_ID that was passed to the explicitlyguarded function (e.g., guarded_close 114) in the parameters 116 atblock 402 matches the guard ID that was recorded in the guard table 122when the fd was opened as shown in FIG. 2. If so, block 410 invokes theappropriate one of the unguarded operations 130 (e.g., do_close 134) toperform the requested operation without performing any further guardchecks. Otherwise, if block 406 determines that the guarded filedescriptor does not apply to the request operation (e.g., because thecorresponding operation flag was not specified when the file descriptorwas opened with guarded_open), then block 410 invokes the unguardeddo_close operation 134. After block 410 closes the file descriptor, theprocess ends. Otherwise, if block 408 determines that the incomingguard_ID does not match the file descriptor, then block 412 generates aguard error (e.g., EGUARD) or exception (e.g., guard mismatch) withoutperforming the requested file operation, and the process ends. The erroror exception can be used to identify the source or location in theapplication program code 104 that erroneously invoked the explicitlyguarded function 110 with an inconsistent or incorrect file descriptorvalue so that the error can be corrected.

FIG. 5 shows a system block diagram of computer system 500 used toexecute the software of an embodiment. Computer system 500 includessubsystems such as a central processor 502, system memory 504, fixedstorage 506 (e.g., hard drive), removable storage 508 (e.g., FLASH), andnetwork interface 510. The central processor 502, for example, canexecute computer program code (e.g., an operating system) to implementthe invention. An operating system is normally, but necessarily)resident in the system memory 504 during its execution. Other computersystems suitable for use with the invention may include additional orfewer subsystems. For example, another computer system could includemore than one processor 502 (i.e., a multi-processor system) or a cachememory.

The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specificnomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the describedembodiments. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art thatthe specific details are not required in order to practice the describedembodiments. Thus, the foregoing descriptions of specific embodimentsare presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are notintended to be exhaustive or to limit the described embodiments to theprecise forms disclosed. It will be apparent to one of ordinary skill inthe art that many modifications and variations are possible in view ofthe above teachings.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in detail by way ofillustration and example for purposes of clarity and understanding, itwill be recognized that the above described invention may be embodied innumerous other specific variations and embodiments without departingfrom the spirit or essential characteristics of the invention. Certainchanges and modifications may be practiced, and it is understood thatthe invention is not to be limited by the foregoing details, but ratheris to be defined by the scope of the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method comprising: attempting, by a computersystem, to perform a file operation on a file descriptor, wherein theattempting comprises receiving, by the computer system, the filedescriptor and a guard identifier; determining, by the computer system,whether the guard identifier is invalid for the file descriptor; andgenerating, by the computer system, a guard violation in response to theguard identifier being invalid for the file descriptor.
 2. The method ofclaim 1, wherein determining whether the guard identifier is invalid forthe file descriptor comprises: searching, by the computer system, alookup table that associates valid guard identifiers with filedescriptors for one or more associations between the file descriptor andthe guard identifier; and determining, by the computer system, that theguard identifier is invalid in response to the search finding noassociation between the file descriptor and the guard identifier in thelookup table.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether theguard identifier is invalid further comprises: determining, by thecomputer system, whether the file descriptor is applicable to the fileoperation; searching, by the computer system, a lookup table thatassociates valid guard identifiers with file descriptors for one or moreassociations between the file descriptor and the guard identifier; anddetermining, by the computer system, that the guard identifier isinvalid in response to the file descriptor being applicable to the fileoperation and the search finding no association between the filedescriptor and the guard identifier.
 4. The method of claim 3, furthercomprising: determining, by the computer system, that the filedescriptor is applicable to the file operation in response to the fileoperation being associated with the file descriptor in a lookup tablethat associates file descriptors with operations to which the filedescriptors apply.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the file operationis selected from one or more of the following operations: closing aguarded file descriptor, reading from a guarded file descriptor, writingto a guarded file descriptor, duplicating a guarded file descriptor,sending a guarded file descriptor over a socket, performing advisorylocking on a guarded file descriptor, clearing a close-on-exec flag of aguarded file descriptor, or making a guarded file descriptor into a fileport.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein generating a guard violationcomprises: logging, by the computer system, an error in accordance withthe guard violation, and logging, by the computer system, the errorcomprises logging pertinent state data about the file descriptor and theoperation attempted on the file descriptor.
 7. The method of claim 6,wherein the state data comprises a stack trace identifying a location inprogram code of the attempt to perform the file operation.
 8. The methodof claim 6, the error comprising: an exception code configured todescribe the guarded operation; a guard identifier; and a filedescriptor number.
 9. The method of claim 8, further comprising:generating, by the computer system, a guard exception in accordance withthe guard violation, the guard exception including a guard exceptioncode corresponding to the guarded operation.
 10. The method of claim 9,wherein the guard exception code is identified in accordance with one ormore of the following guard exception codes: closing a guarded filedescriptor, reading from a guarded file descriptor, writing to a guardedfile descriptor, duplicating a guarded file descriptor, sending aguarded file descriptor over a socket, performing advisory locking on aguarded file descriptor, clearing a close-on-exec flag of a guarded filedescriptor, making a guarded file descriptor into a file port, orinvoking a guarded file descriptor operation with in incorrect guardidentifier.
 11. The method of claim 9, further comprising: using, by thecomputer system, the guard exception to capture a program state inaccordance with the guard violation; and using, by the computer system,the captured program state to analyze a cause of the guard violation.12. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, by thecomputer system, a request to create a guard for the file descriptorprior to attempting to perform the file operation, the request includingthe file descriptor and the guard identifier; and associating, by thecomputer system, the guard identifier with the file descriptor in alookup table.
 13. The method of claim 12, the request further comprisingone or more operations to be guarded, the method further comprising:associating, by the computer system, the one or more operations with thefile descriptor in the lookup table.
 14. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising: performing, by the computer system, a guarded open operationon a file prior to attempting to perform the file operation, whereinperforming the guarded open operation comprises doing the followingatomically: performing, by the computer system, an unguarded openoperation on the file descriptor, and associating, by the computersystem, the file descriptor with the guard identifier.
 15. A methodcomprising: attempting, by a computer system, to perform a fileoperation on a file descriptor, wherein the attempting comprisesreceiving, by the computer system, the file descriptor and a guardidentifier; determining, by the computer system, whether the guardidentifier is valid for the file descriptor; and performing, by thecomputer system, the file operation on the file descriptor in responseto the guard identifier being valid for the file descriptor.
 16. Themethod of claim 15, wherein determining whether the guard identifier isvalid for the file descriptor comprises: searching, by the computersystem, a lookup table that associates valid guard identifiers with filedescriptors for one or more associations between the file descriptor andthe guard identifier; and determining, by the computer system, that theguard identifier is valid in response to the search finding anassociation between the file descriptor and the guard identifier in thelookup table.
 17. The method of claim 15, wherein determining whetherthe guard identifier is valid further comprises: determining, by thecomputer system, whether the file descriptor is applicable to the fileoperation; searching, by the computer system, a lookup table thatassociates valid guard identifiers with file descriptors for one or moreassociations between the file descriptor and the guard identifier; anddetermining that the guard identifier is valid in response to the filedescriptor being applicable to the file operation and the search findingan association between the file descriptor and the guard identifier. 18.A non-transitory computer readable medium for a computer system, thenon-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon computerprogram code executable by a processor, the computer program codecomprising: computer program code that causes the processor to receivean invocation of a file operation on a file descriptor; computer programcode that causes the processor to receive a guard identifier associatedwith the invocation; computer program code that causes the processor todetermine that the guard identifier is associated with the filedescriptor, the association established prior to receiving theinvocation; and computer program code that causes the processor toperform the file operation on the file descriptor in response todetermining that the guard identifier is associated with the filedescriptor.
 19. The computer readable medium of claim 18, wherein thecomputer program code that causes the processor to determine that theguard identifier is associated with the file descriptor comprises:computer program code that causes the processor to search a memory forone or more associations between the file descriptor and the guardidentifier; and computer program code that causes the processor todetermine that the guard identifier is associated with the filedescriptor in response to finding at least one association between thefile descriptor and the guard identifier in the memory.
 20. A systemcomprising: a processing unit configured to: attempt to perform a fileoperation on a file descriptor, wherein the attempting comprisesreceiving, by the computer system, the file descriptor and a guardidentifier; determine that the guard identifier is associated with thefile descriptor by a lookup table; determine that the file operation isnot associated with the file descriptor by the lookup table; and preventexecution of the file operation in response to determining that the fileoperation is not associated with the guard identifier by the lookuptable.